public inbox for linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jean Pihet <jpihet@mvista.com>
To: "Reddy, Teerth" <teerth@ti.com>
Cc: "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] OMAP3: PM:  Dynamic calculation of SDRC clock stabilization delay
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 14:14:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200912111414.41310.jpihet@mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5A47E75E594F054BAF48C5E4FC4B92AB030ADD4B50@dbde02.ent.ti.com>

On Friday 11 December 2009 13:05:37 Reddy, Teerth wrote:
> Reposting the patch with proper format
>
> From: Teerth Reddy <teerth@ti.com>
>
> This patch sets the dpll3 clock stabilization delay during
> DVFS. The stabilization delay is calculated dynamically
> using the ARM performance counter.
> Currently 6us of SDRC stabilization value is used to get
> the correct delay.
That is a good thing to have! However the counters might already be in use, 
cf. below

>
> Signed-off-by: Romit Dasgupta <romit@ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Teerth Reddy <teerth@ti.com>
> ---
>  mach-omap2/clock34xx.c        |   32 +++++++++++++---------------
>  mach-omap2/sram34xx.S         |    7 ++++++
>  plat-omap/Makefile            |    1
>  plat-omap/include/plat/pmc.h  |    9 ++++++++
>  plat-omap/include/plat/sram.h |    6 +++++
>  plat-omap/pmc.c               |   47
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ plat-omap/sram.c              | 
>  23 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  7 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock34xx.c
> b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock34xx.c index da5bc1f..dd49938 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock34xx.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock34xx.c
> @@ -37,6 +37,8 @@
>  #include <asm/div64.h>
>  #include <asm/clkdev.h>
>
> +#include <plat/pmc.h>
> +
>  #include <plat/sdrc.h>
>  #include "clock.h"
>  #include "prm.h"
> @@ -46,6 +48,8 @@
>
>  static const struct clkops clkops_noncore_dpll_ops;
>
> +unsigned int delay_sram;
> +
>  static void omap3430es2_clk_ssi_find_idlest(struct clk *clk,
>  					    void __iomem **idlest_reg,
>  					    u8 *idlest_bit);
> @@ -333,14 +337,9 @@ static struct omap_clk omap34xx_clks[] = {
>  /* Scale factor for fixed-point arith in omap3_core_dpll_m2_set_rate() */
>  #define SDRC_MPURATE_SCALE		8
>
> -/* 2^SDRC_MPURATE_BASE_SHIFT: MPU MHz that SDRC_MPURATE_LOOPS is defined
> for */ -#define SDRC_MPURATE_BASE_SHIFT		9
> -
> -/*
> - * SDRC_MPURATE_LOOPS: Number of MPU loops to execute at
> - * 2^MPURATE_BASE_SHIFT MHz for SDRC to stabilize
> - */
> -#define SDRC_MPURATE_LOOPS		96
> +/* SDRC_TIME_STABILIZE: Time for SDRC to stabilize in us */
> +/* hardcoded currently */
> +#define	SDRC_TIME_STABILIZE		6
>
>  /*
>   * DPLL5_FREQ_FOR_USBHOST: USBHOST and USBTLL are the only clocks
> @@ -870,16 +869,10 @@ static int omap3_core_dpll_m2_set_rate(struct clk
> *clk, unsigned long rate) unlock_dll = 1;
>  	}
>
> -	/*
> -	 * XXX This only needs to be done when the CPU frequency changes
> -	 */
> +	/* Calculate the number of MPU cycles to wait for SDRC to stabilize */
> +
>  	mpurate = arm_fck.rate / CYCLES_PER_MHZ;
> -	c = (mpurate << SDRC_MPURATE_SCALE) >> SDRC_MPURATE_BASE_SHIFT;
> -	c += 1;  /* for safety */
> -	c *= SDRC_MPURATE_LOOPS;
> -	c >>= SDRC_MPURATE_SCALE;
> -	if (c == 0)
> -		c = 1;
> +	c = ((SDRC_TIME_STABILIZE * mpurate) / (delay_sram * 2));
>
>  	pr_debug("clock: changing CORE DPLL rate from %lu to %lu\n", clk->rate,
>  		 validrate);
> @@ -1228,6 +1221,11 @@ int __init omap2_clk_init(void)
>  	vclk = clk_get(NULL, "virt_prcm_set");
>  	sclk = clk_get(NULL, "sys_ck");
>  #endif
> +
> +	/* Measure sram delay */
> +	delay_sram = measure_sram_delay(10000)/(10000*2);
> +	pr_debug("SRAM delay: %d\n", delay_sram);
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sram34xx.S
> b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sram34xx.S index 82aa4a3..dc0ac72 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sram34xx.S
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sram34xx.S
> @@ -298,3 +298,10 @@ core_m2_mask_val:
>  ENTRY(omap3_sram_configure_core_dpll_sz)
>  	.word	. - omap3_sram_configure_core_dpll
>
> +ENTRY(__sram_wait_delay)
> +	subs 	r0, r0, #1
> +	bne	__sram_wait_delay
> +	bx	lr
> +
> +ENTRY(__sram_wait_delay_sz)
> +	.word	. - __sram_wait_delay
> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/Makefile b/arch/arm/plat-omap/Makefile
> index 95f8413..aac43da 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/Makefile
> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP16XX) += ocpi.o
>  # omap_device support (OMAP2+ only at the moment)
>  obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP2) += omap_device.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP3) += omap_device.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP3) += pmc.o
>
>  obj-$(CONFIG_OMAP_MCBSP) += mcbsp.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_OMAP_IOMMU) += iommu.o iovmm.o
> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/pmc.h
> b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/pmc.h new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..6d73782
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/pmc.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
> +#ifndef __PMC_H__
> +#define __PMC_H__
> +extern void start_perf_counter(void);
> +extern void start_cycle_counter(void);
> +extern void stop_cycle_counter(void);
> +extern void stop_perf_counter(void);
> +extern unsigned int cycle_count(void);
> +extern unsigned int delay_sram;
> +#endif
> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/sram.h
> b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/sram.h index 16a1b45..6019ed8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/sram.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/sram.h
> @@ -69,6 +69,12 @@ extern u32 omap3_sram_configure_core_dpll(
>  			u32 sdrc_actim_ctrl_b_1, u32 sdrc_mr_1);
>  extern unsigned long omap3_sram_configure_core_dpll_sz;
>
> +extern unsigned int measure_sram_delay(unsigned int);
> +
> +extern u32 __sram_wait_delay(
> +		unsigned int);
> +extern unsigned long __sram_wait_delay_sz;
> +
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PM
>  extern void omap_push_sram_idle(void);
>  #else
> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/pmc.c b/arch/arm/plat-omap/pmc.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..11acf42
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/pmc.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +
> +void start_perf_counter(void)
> +{
> +	unsigned int r1 = 0;
> +	asm("mrc p15, 0, %0, c9, c12, 0" : "=r" (r1));
> +	r1 |= 0x1; /* enable counters */
> +	asm("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c12, 0" : : "r" (r1));
> +	return;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(start_perf_counter);
> +
> +void start_cycle_counter(void)
> +{
> +	unsigned int r2 = 0;
> +	r2 = 0x80000000; /* enable cycle counter only */
> +	asm("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c12, 1" : : "r" (r2));
> +	return;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(start_cycle_counter);
> +
> +unsigned int cycle_count(void)
> +{
> +	unsigned int rd = 0;
> +	asm("mrc p15, 0, %0, c9, c13, 0" : "=r" (rd));
> +	return rd;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(cycle_count);
> +
> +
> +void stop_cycle_counter(void)
> +{
> +	unsigned int r3 = 0;
> +	r3 = 0x0; /* disable cycle counter */
> +	asm("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c12, 1" : : "r" (r3));
> +	return;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(stop_cycle_counter);
> +
> +void stop_perf_counter(void)
> +{
> +	unsigned int r1 = 0;
> +	r1 = 0x0; /* disable counters */
> +	asm("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c12, 0" : : "r" (r1));
> +	return;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(stop_perf_counter);
Ok what happens if the PMU unit already is enabled by e.g. perfcounters or 
oprofile?
For example the perfcounter code tries to acquire the PMU lock before trying 
to use it. That might be good to use it here also.

Is pm.c the right place to put this code? This belongs more to a perf unit 
measurement code.

> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/sram.c b/arch/arm/plat-omap/sram.c
> index 3e92366..4ed6a48 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/sram.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/sram.c
> @@ -29,6 +29,10 @@
>  #include <plat/board.h>
>  #include <plat/cpu.h>
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP3
> +#include <plat/pmc.h>
> +#endif
> +
>  #include <plat/control.h>
>
>  #if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP2) || defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP3)
> @@ -423,6 +427,25 @@ static inline int omap34xx_sram_init(void)
>  }
>  #endif
>
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP3
> +unsigned int measure_sram_delay(unsigned int loop)
> +{
> +	unsigned int start = 0, end = 0;
> +	void (*_omap3_sram_delay)(unsigned long);
> +	_omap3_sram_delay = omap_sram_push(__sram_wait_delay,
> +						__sram_wait_delay_sz);
> +	start_perf_counter();
> +	start_cycle_counter();
> +	start = cycle_count();
> +	_omap3_sram_delay(loop);
> +	end = cycle_count();
> +	stop_cycle_counter();
> +	stop_perf_counter();
> +	return end - start;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
>  int __init omap_sram_init(void)
>  {
>  	omap_detect_sram();
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-12-11 13:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-12-11 12:05 [PATCH] OMAP3: PM: Dynamic calculation of SDRC clock stabilization delay Reddy, Teerth
2009-12-11 12:23 ` Menon, Nishanth
2009-12-11 12:31   ` Romit Dasgupta
2009-12-11 13:42     ` Nishanth Menon
2009-12-12  4:43       ` Nishanth Menon
2009-12-14  8:19         ` Romit Dasgupta
2009-12-11 13:14 ` Jean Pihet [this message]
2009-12-11 14:07   ` Romit Dasgupta
2009-12-11 16:38 ` Kevin Hilman
2009-12-12  0:49   ` Kevin Hilman
2009-12-14  9:01     ` Romit Dasgupta
2009-12-14 16:10       ` Kevin Hilman
2009-12-14 16:41         ` Dasgupta, Romit
2009-12-14 19:34           ` Kevin Hilman
2009-12-21 11:44             ` Reddy, Teerth
2009-12-22 15:56               ` Kevin Hilman
2009-12-22 16:00                 ` Sripathy, Vishwanath
2009-12-22 16:56                   ` Kevin Hilman
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-12-24  5:33 Reddy, Teerth
2009-12-24 10:31 ` Romit Dasgupta
2009-12-28 19:57 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-01-06 23:06 ` Kevin Hilman
2010-01-21  5:35   ` Paul Walmsley
2010-01-21  8:58     ` Reddy, Teerth
2010-02-08 22:52       ` Paul Walmsley
2009-12-23 13:56 Reddy, Teerth
2009-12-23 14:32 ` Romit Dasgupta
2009-12-24  5:31   ` Reddy, Teerth
2009-12-11 12:42 Romit Dasgupta
2009-12-11 10:35 Reddy, Teerth

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200912111414.41310.jpihet@mvista.com \
    --to=jpihet@mvista.com \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=teerth@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox