From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Samuel Ortiz Subject: Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 10:30:54 +0100 Message-ID: <20091216093054.GB3788@sortiz.org> References: <20091215164108.45c9d766.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20091215145344.GA30710@sirena.org.uk> <20091215172717.GF4575@atomide.com> <20091216094541.e59d36fa.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091216094541.e59d36fa.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Tony Lindgren , Mark Brown , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Ujfalusi , Linus , Andrew Morton , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Hi Stephen, On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 09:45:41AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Tony, > > On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 09:27:17 -0800 Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > > * Mark Brown [091215 06:52]: > > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 04:41:08PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > > > > I have applied this patch for today (please check): > > > > > > Looks good to me too, fwiw: > > > > > > Acked-by: Mark Brown > > > > Good thing we have for-next to catch things like this. > > Except if the renaming patch had gone through linux-next (even for one > day) we would have found the problem *before* it was in Linus' tree ... Mea maxima culpa. I could come up with several reason why I rushed this patch in, but none of them would be good. I apologize here. > (/me is a little grumpy :-)) I understand, sorry again. Cheers, Samuel. > -- > Cheers, > Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au > http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ -- Intel Open Source Technology Centre http://oss.intel.com/