From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Luke-Jr" Subject: Re: problem with n810 boot up Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 11:43:44 -0600 Message-ID: <201001091143.48472.luke@dashjr.org> References: <200912290152.16357.luke@dashjr.org> <201001051747.02221.luke@dashjr.org> <20100109050338.GB9728@swansys> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from vps2.mechanicalrealm.com ([66.216.20.21]:52172 "EHLO zinan.dashjr.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754679Ab0AIRoQ (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Jan 2010 12:44:16 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20100109050338.GB9728@swansys> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: green Cc: "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" On Friday 08 January 2010 11:03:38 pm green wrote: > Luke-Jr wrote at 2010-01-05 17:46 -0600: > > * N900 is supposedly mostly mainlined already, and supposedly Nokia will > > actually finish the job with unlike N8x0; it also has nicer hardware, > > even if you just ignore the cellular capabilities > > You say "supposedly"; where do you get this information? Is there a > mailing list or something...? IRC: #Maemo on FreeNode. > I would like to find out what works before making a purchase. > I made careless assumptions about Linux support when purchasing the N810. Probably best to do a through study of the code, then. While things are supposedly better with the N900, things were supposedly good with the N810 too, which was more or less advertised as being open source and running Linux even though neither will probably ever be true at this rate. Nokia has taught me not to trust such claims even when they have a large fan backing. :/ Luke