From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: green Subject: Re: problem with n810 boot up Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 17:53:20 -0600 Message-ID: <20100109235320.GF9728@swansys> References: <200912290152.16357.luke@dashjr.org> <201001051747.02221.luke@dashjr.org> <20100109050338.GB9728@swansys> <201001091143.48472.luke@dashjr.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2zue9K3IhLF/3KAd" Return-path: Received: from mail-ew0-f214.google.com ([209.85.219.214]:51277 "EHLO mail-ew0-f214.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751178Ab0AIXxT (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Jan 2010 18:53:19 -0500 Received: by ewy6 with SMTP id 6so20384105ewy.29 for ; Sat, 09 Jan 2010 15:53:17 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201001091143.48472.luke@dashjr.org> Content-Language: en Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" --2zue9K3IhLF/3KAd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Luke-Jr wrote at 2010-01-09 11:43 -0600: > On Friday 08 January 2010 11:03:38 pm green wrote: > > Luke-Jr wrote at 2010-01-05 17:46 -0600: > > > * N900 is supposedly mostly mainlined already, and supposedly Nokia w= ill > > > actually finish the job with unlike N8x0; it also has nicer hardware, > > > even if you just ignore the cellular capabilities > >=20 > > You say "supposedly"; where do you get this information? Is there a > > mailing list or something...?=20 >=20 > IRC: #Maemo on FreeNode. Okay; thanks. > > I would like to find out what works before making a purchase.=20 > > I made careless assumptions about Linux support when purchasing the N8= 10. >=20 > Probably best to do a through study of the code, then. While things are= =20 > supposedly better with the N900, things were supposedly good with the N81= 0=20 > too, which was more or less advertised as being open source and running L= inux=20 > even though neither will probably ever be true at this rate. Nokia has ta= ught=20 > me not to trust such claims even when they have a large fan backing. :/ The FOSS community wants to support Linux/etc. through their purchases,=20 but it seems that Nokia has taken advantage of that. I will be more cautio= us=20 in the future, especially regarding Nokia. --2zue9K3IhLF/3KAd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAktJFu8ACgkQ682C+dBP+oRcGACfTP7Pm4OB4Kscil5mcjydXAMo yJ8Anjbm4NztRfD87t6oD1Ri1Hd649P2 =9aQE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2zue9K3IhLF/3KAd--