From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Brownell Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/4] twl4030 threaded_irq support Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 23:36:55 -0800 Message-ID: <201001252336.55577.david-b@pacbell.net> References: <20091212183410.GF3092@sirena.org.uk> <1260786654-13294-1-git-send-email-felipe.balbi@nokia.com> <201001252306.55625.david-b@pacbell.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from smtp125.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com ([69.147.65.184]:47347 "HELO smtp125.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752189Ab0AZHng (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jan 2010 02:43:36 -0500 In-Reply-To: <201001252306.55625.david-b@pacbell.net> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Felipe Balbi Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linux OMAP Mailing List , Tony Lindgren , Aaro Koskinen , Linux USB Mailing List , Anton Vorontsov , Grazvydas Ignotas , Madhusudhan Chikkature , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Mark Brown , Samuel Ortiz On Monday 25 January 2010, David Brownell wrote: > Did the threaded IRQ stuff ever get set up so that the top > level IRQ thread didn't have to hand off to another thread > each time? =A0(That's how the current stuff works. =A0One thread > calling out to each handler.) Yes: set_irq_nested_thread(). Looks like the toplevel IRQ demux (in drivers/mfd/twl*irq*c) should use that, along with the ONESHOT flag and (eventually) bus_lock stuff. All the key parts that were missing a few years ago now seem to be present. But, not yet in use here. :) - Dave -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html