From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/24] omap4 for 2.6.34 Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:19:54 -0800 Message-ID: <20100217171954.GW21755@atomide.com> References: <20100216190257.GP21755@atomide.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.72]:52665 "EHLO mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752941Ab0BQRTP (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Feb 2010 12:19:15 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: "Shilimkar, Santosh" Cc: Ben Dooks , Samuel Ortiz , Kevin Hilman , Paul Walmsley , "lrg@slimlogic.co.uk" , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" * Shilimkar, Santosh [100216 21:14]: > > > 2. Clock framework dummy_ck changes done against linux-omap master branch. > > This should leave out most of the driver changes in your series. > > Send to linux-omap list with linux-arm-kernel Cc'd. > Will do. Some clock node names are changed and since we do clk_get based on clock node > names, such drivers need to change. Hmm, that does not sound right, the clock users need to stay generic. Can't you use an alias for those clocks in omap44xx_clks[]? Regards, Tony