From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Second set of OMAP clock/hwmod patches for 2.6.34 Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:31:12 -0800 Message-ID: <20100225223111.GO28173@atomide.com> References: <20100224190211.GS28173@atomide.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.72]:63288 "EHLO mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934167Ab0BYWaK (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:30:10 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Paul Walmsley Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org * Paul Walmsley [100224 12:18]: > On Wed, 24 Feb 2010, Paul Walmsley wrote: > > > On Wed, 24 Feb 2010, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > > > * Paul Walmsley [100224 10:15]: > > > > > > > > Hi Tony, > > > > > > > > The following changes since commit 0482e3c6f704d25b6a4e3c940caeeacece4e6d74: > > > > Tony Lindgren (1): > > > > Merge branch 'omap-fixes-for-linus' into omap-for-linus > > > > > > > > are available in the git repository at: > > > > > > > > git://git.pwsan.com/linux-2.6 for_2.6.34_b > > > > > > Hmm this does not seem to merge without conflicts to omap-for-linus, > > > maybe take a look if you can merge/rebase it? > > > > > > I'd assume rebasing or merging your branch with > > > 80c20d543d142ee54ec85259b77aaf0b83c32db5 will do the trick. > > > > Looks like 4751227df948582e82f19df30efa662ab71fa980 is the problem. > > Cool, it turned out to be not too bad to rebase. for_2.6.34_b branch is > updated. I'll retest here and resend a pull request after the tests are > complete. OK that's merged now. I think we're pretty much done for this merge window. I'll take a look at few more board-*.c patches though. Tony