From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Russell King - ARM Linux Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ftrace - add ftrace function_graph support on ARM Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2010 20:18:49 +0000 Message-ID: <20100306201849.GD13262@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <4B91A39F.8050502@am.sony.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B91A39F.8050502@am.sony.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-arm-kernel-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Tim Bird Cc: linux-omap , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 04:36:47PM -0800, Tim Bird wrote: > IRQENTRY_TEXT was added to vmlinux.lds.S (to eliminate > a compiler error on kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c), > although no routines were marked as __irq_entry. Well, ARM already places the assembly exception text in its own separate section for other reasons. We can't place it in two sections. What is __irq_entry used for? Just the low level assembly or C functions?