From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Felipe Balbi Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/4] gpiolib: introduce set_debounce method Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 17:50:59 +0300 Message-ID: <20100331145059.GA3833@gandalf> References: <1270038435-28106-1-git-send-email-felipe.balbi@nokia.com> <1270038435-28106-2-git-send-email-felipe.balbi@nokia.com> <20100331134627.GA27613@sirena.org.uk> Reply-To: me@felipebalbi.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from ns1.siteground211.com ([209.62.36.12]:43218 "EHLO serv01.siteground211.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751813Ab0CaOuc (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Mar 2010 10:50:32 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100331134627.GA27613@sirena.org.uk> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Brown Cc: Felipe Balbi , David Brownell , Tony Lindgren , Linux OMAP Mailing List On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 02:46:28PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > +int gpio_set_debounce(unsigned gpio, int value) > > +{ > > What are the intended semantics of value here? debounce time. I just used value because other functions also call it value. -- balbi