From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Felipe Balbi Subject: Re: Where did the twl4030 battery charging code go? Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 13:47:22 +0300 Message-ID: <20100401104722.GJ16297@nokia.com> References: <738b3f7e1003300859t633ace94h5945e9974109e176@mail.gmail.com> <20100401101620.GM31200@atomide.com> Reply-To: felipe.balbi@nokia.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Return-path: Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([192.100.122.230]:32041 "EHLO mgw-mx03.nokia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751623Ab0DAKsJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Apr 2010 06:48:09 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100401101620.GM31200@atomide.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: ext Tony Lindgren Cc: Peter Barada , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 12:16:20PM +0200, ext Tony Lindgren wrote: >If it's not in mainline, we don't have it queued anywhere else. >The missing pieces should be sent via the MFD list after the >necessary cleanups. for this case, I suggest adding power_supply list and maintainers to the loop. -- balbi