From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: kishore kadiyala <kishore.kadiyala@ti.com>
Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
madhu.cr@ti.com, jarkko.lavinen@nokia.com,
rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk, santosh.shilimkar@ti.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] OMAP4-HSMMC: Adding Card detect support
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 12:08:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100421190827.GH18272@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <63568.10.24.255.18.1271874040.squirrel@dbdmail.itg.ti.com>
* kishore kadiyala <kishore.kadiyala@ti.com> [100421 11:16]:
> Since OMAP4's card detection doesn't support GPIO,this patch
> basically moves card detection API from driver to Board file so
> that it can handle in both GPIO and NON-GPIO case.
> This Patch also adds a flag which can differentiate whether the
> card-detect line is GPIO or NON-GPIO.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kishore Kadiyala <kishore.kadiyala@ti.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c | 1 +
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/hsmmc.c | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/hsmmc.h | 1 +
> arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/mmc.h | 3 +-
> drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c | 29 +-----------
> 5 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c
> index eae7c80..4e8f74e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c
> @@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ static struct omap2_hsmmc_info mmc[] = {
> * but is a phoenix interrupt
> */
> .gpio_cd = 384,
> + .cd_type = true,
> .gpio_wp = -EINVAL,
> },
> {
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/hsmmc.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/hsmmc.c
> index 9ad2295..ca3d4c9 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/hsmmc.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/hsmmc.c
> @@ -13,6 +13,8 @@
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> #include <linux/string.h>
> #include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/gpio.h>
> +#include <linux/i2c/twl.h>
> #include <mach/hardware.h>
> #include <plat/control.h>
> #include <plat/mmc.h>
> @@ -27,7 +29,11 @@ static u16 control_devconf1_offset;
>
> #define HSMMC_NAME_LEN 9
>
> +/* Phoenix Registers */
> +#define TWL6030_MMCCTRL 0xEE
This define belongs to the twl code.
> static struct hsmmc_controller {
> + struct omap_mmc_platform_data *mmc;
> char name[HSMMC_NAME_LEN + 1];
> } hsmmc[OMAP34XX_NR_MMC];
>
> @@ -42,6 +48,50 @@ static int hsmmc_get_context_loss(struct device *dev)
> #define hsmmc_get_context_loss NULL
> #endif
>
> +static int twl_mmc_get_cover_state(struct device *dev, int slot)
> +{
> + struct omap_mmc_platform_data *mmc = dev->platform_data;
> +
> + /* NOTE: assumes card detect signal is active-low */
> + return !gpio_get_value_cansleep(mmc->slots[0].switch_pin);
> +}
> +
> +static int twl_mmc_card_detect(int irq)
> +{
> + unsigned i;
> + u8 read_reg;
> + unsigned res;
> +
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(hsmmc); i++) {
> + struct omap_mmc_platform_data *mmc;
> +
> + mmc = hsmmc[i].mmc;
> + if (!mmc)
> + continue;
> + if (irq != mmc->slots[0].card_detect_irq)
> + continue;
> +
> + if (mmc->slots[0].nongpio_cd) {
> + /* BIT0 of REG_MMC_CTRL
> + * 0 - Card not present
> + * 1 - Card present
> + */
> + res = twl_i2c_read_u8(TWL6030_MODULE_ID0,
> + &read_reg, TWL6030_MMCCTRL);
> + if (res >= 0)
> + return read_reg & 0x1;
> + return !gpio_get_value_cansleep
> + (mmc->slots[0].switch_pin);
> + } else {
> + /* NOTE: assumes card detect signal is active-low */
> + return !gpio_get_value_cansleep
> + (mmc->slots[0].switch_pin);
> + }
> + }
> + return -ENOSYS;
> +}
You should just register a separate twl_card_detect function during init
instead of doing these tests over and over again.
> static void hsmmc1_before_set_reg(struct device *dev, int slot,
> int power_on, int vdd)
> {
> @@ -189,8 +239,32 @@ void __init omap2_hsmmc_init(struct omap2_hsmmc_info
> mmc->get_context_loss_count = hsmmc_get_context_loss;
>
> mmc->slots[0].switch_pin = c->gpio_cd;
> + mmc->slots[0].nongpio_cd = c->cd_type;
> mmc->slots[0].gpio_wp = c->gpio_wp;
>
> + /* TWL Card detect can be GPIO based or NON-GPIO Based */
> + if (!c->cd_type) {
> + if (gpio_is_valid(c->gpio_cd)) {
> + mmc->slots[0].card_detect_irq =
> + gpio_to_irq(c->gpio_cd);
> + if (c->cover_only)
> + mmc->slots[0].get_cover_state =
> + twl_mmc_get_cover_state;
> + else
> + mmc->slots[0].card_detect =
> + twl_mmc_card_detect;
> + } else
> + mmc->slots[0].switch_pin = -EINVAL;
> + } else {
> + mmc->slots[0].card_detect_irq = c->gpio_cd;
> + if (c->cover_only)
> + mmc->slots[0].get_cover_state =
> + twl_mmc_get_cover_state;
> + else
> + mmc->slots[0].card_detect =
> + twl_mmc_card_detect;
> + }
> +
> mmc->slots[0].remux = c->remux;
>
> if (c->cover_only)
Once you register separate twl_card_detect during init, this part will
not be needed.
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/hsmmc.h b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/hsmmc.h
> index 36f0ba8..3dfc43a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/hsmmc.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/hsmmc.h
> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ struct omap2_hsmmc_info {
> bool no_off; /* power_saving and power is not to go off */
> bool vcc_aux_disable_is_sleep; /* Regulator off remapped to sleep */
> int gpio_cd; /* or -EINVAL */
> + bool cd_type; /* Card detect Type:NON-GPIO=true,GPIO=flase */
> int gpio_wp; /* or -EINVAL */
> char *name; /* or NULL for default */
> struct device *dev; /* returned: pointer to mmc adapter */
> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/mmc.h b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/mmc.h
> index a1bac07..521decc 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/mmc.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/mmc.h
> @@ -103,6 +103,7 @@ struct omap_mmc_platform_data {
> unsigned vcc_aux_disable_is_sleep:1;
>
> int switch_pin; /* gpio (card detect) */
> + unsigned nongpio_cd:1; /* NON-GPIO=true , GPIO=false */
> int gpio_wp; /* gpio (write protect) */
>
> int (*set_bus_mode)(struct device *dev, int slot, int bus_mode);
> @@ -132,7 +133,7 @@ struct omap_mmc_platform_data {
>
> /* Card detection IRQs */
> int card_detect_irq;
> - int (*card_detect)(struct device *dev, int slot);
> + int (*card_detect)(int irq);
>
> unsigned int ban_openended:1;
>
Why are you removing *dev from card_detect?
Will comment further after that all is fixed. Please also make sure
omap_hsmmc.c compiles and works as a module.
Regards,
Tony
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-21 19:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-21 18:20 [PATCH 3/7] OMAP4-HSMMC: Adding Card detect support kishore kadiyala
2010-04-21 19:08 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2010-04-22 0:11 ` Madhusudhan
2010-05-04 6:11 ` kishore kadiyala
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100421190827.GH18272@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=jarkko.lavinen@nokia.com \
--cc=kishore.kadiyala@ti.com \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=madhu.cr@ti.com \
--cc=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).