From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tytso@mit.edu Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 6) Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 18:24:25 -0400 Message-ID: <20100513222425.GC16989@thunk.org> References: <20100513202320.GF3428@atomide.com> <20100513203412.GA21244@srcf.ucam.org> <201005132321.59245.rjw@sisk.pl> <20100513212556.GI3428@atomide.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100513212556.GI3428@atomide.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Tony Lindgren Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Matthew Garrett , Alan Stern , Paul Walmsley , Arve =?iso-8859-1?B?SGr4bm5lduVn?= , Linux-pm mailing list , Kernel development list , Tejun Heo , Oleg Nesterov , Kevin Hilman , magnus.damm@gmail.com, mark gross , Arjan van de Ven , Geoff Smith , Brian Swetland , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Beno=EEt?= Cousson , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Vitaly Wool , Mark Brown , Liam Girdwood List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 02:25:56PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > I agree and I don't understand the problem that people have with the > > opportunistic suspend feature. > > It seems to be picking quite a few comments for one. It's picking up a lot of comments because *someone* seems to be trying to use a "last post wins" style of argumentation. One of the things that is hard for people who aren't regular denizens of LKML is to understand whose comments can be ignored..... Seriously, you are posting a lot, but it's not clear you're making any clear sense... - Ted