From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Felipe Balbi Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8) Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 07:32:24 +0300 Message-ID: <20100524043224.GA31700@nokia.com> References: <1274482015-30899-1-git-send-email-arve@android.com> <201005240246.55043.rjw@sisk.pl> Reply-To: felipe.balbi@nokia.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201005240246.55043.rjw@sisk.pl> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: "ext Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org" , Linux OMAP Mailing List List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 02:46:54AM +0200, ext Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >On Saturday 22 May 2010, Arve Hj=F8nnev=E5g wrote: >> This patch series adds a suspend-block api that provides the same >> functionality as the android wakelock api. This version adds a >> delay before suspending again if no suspend blockers were used >> during the last suspend attempt. > >Patches [1-6/8] applied to suspend-2.6/linux-next funny thing is that even without sorting out the concerns plenty of = developers had on the other thread, this series is still taken. What's = the point in dicussing/reviewing the patches then ? -- = balbi DefectiveByDesign.org