From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8) Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 19:17:12 +0100 Message-ID: <20100527181712.GI3543@srcf.ucam.org> References: <20100527173118.GE2468@srcf.ucam.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Alan Stern , Peter Zijlstra , Paul@smtp1.linux-foundation.org, LKML , Florian Mickler , felipe.balbi@nokia.com, Linux OMAP Mailing List , Linux PM , Alan Cox List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 08:05:39PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > You're just not getting it. If user space has consumed the event is > not relevant at all. > > What's relevant is whether the app has processed the event and reacted > accordingly. That's all that matters. And how do you know that? We can't rely on the process scheduler. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org