From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8) Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 14:22:44 +0100 Message-ID: <20100528132244.GA25189@srcf.ucam.org> References: <201005280041.43553.rjw@sisk.pl> <20100528001514.28e593ef@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <201005280205.01561.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Mike Chan Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Alan Cox , Peter Zijlstra , Brian Swetland , Dmitry Torokhov , LKML , Arve@smtp1.linux-foundation.org, Florian Mickler , Linux PM , Thomas Gleixner , Linux OMAP Mailing List , felipe.balbi@nokia.com List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 05:49:36PM -0700, Mike Chan wrote: > Even if we used the proposed QoS replacement, are there suggestions on > how to keep the cpu idle for longer than 2 seconds in Linux without > using suspend? I believe that the "Maximum idle time on 32-bit is 2 seconds" issue is solved in recent kernels. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org