From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8) Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 15:21:25 +0100 Message-ID: <20100528142124.GA26733@srcf.ucam.org> References: <20100527223605.GB11364@srcf.ucam.org> <20100527235546.09f3ce8a@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20100528043114.GC26177@thunk.org> <20100528103713.0a7952d9@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20100528114123.GA22947@srcf.ucam.org> <4BFFB681.1000105@nokia.com> <4BFFC5DF.5030504@nokia.com> <20100528133900.GG26177@thunk.org> <4BFFCFC7.7070302@nokia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4BFFCFC7.7070302@nokia.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Igor Stoppa Cc: tytso@mit.edu, ext Brian Swetland , Alan Cox , Peter Zijlstra , LKML , Florian Mickler , Linux PM , Thomas Gleixner , Linux OMAP Mailing List , "Balbi Felipe (Nokia-D/Helsinki)" List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 05:14:31PM +0300, Igor Stoppa wrote: > I have seen very good proposals for saner solutions. > > Is that progress? The proposals so far involve either redefining the problem space or being inherently racey. It may be that we can redefine the problem space in such a way that everyone's happy, but it's not possible to do so by fiat. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org