From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Florian Mickler Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8) Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 23:13:33 +0200 Message-ID: <20100531231333.126b6a16@schatten.dmk.lab> References: <20100527222514.0a1710bf@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20100527230806.4deb6de3@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20100527220949.GB10602@srcf.ucam.org> <20100527232357.6d14fdb2@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20100527223605.GB11364@srcf.ucam.org> <20100527235546.09f3ce8a@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20100528043114.GC26177@thunk.org> <1275030704.32462.11.camel@laptop> <1275120618.27810.12699.camel@twins> <1275149418.4503.128.camel@mulgrave.site> <1275156734.1645.496.camel@laptop> <20100531221219.212bf119@schatten.dmk.lab> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20100531221219.212bf119@schatten.dmk.lab> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: James Bottomley , Arve =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Hj=F8n?= =?ISO-8859-15?Q?nev=E5g?= , tytso@mit.edu, LKML , Linux PM , Thomas Gleixner , Linux OMAP Mailing List , felipe.balbi@nokia.com, Alan Cox List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Hi, again! My two mails were probably a bit pointless and not helping to find a solution. There are notable and useful approaches mentioned by Peter to the mitigation problem. It's just that it's not the one and only way to think about this. Just rants, Flo