From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Felipe Balbi Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] omap iommu: for-next for 2.6.35-rc1 Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 13:01:00 +0300 Message-ID: <20100602100100.GJ6465@nokia.com> References: <20100602.105054.59678037.Hiroshi.DOYU@nokia.com> Reply-To: felipe.balbi@nokia.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Return-path: Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([192.100.122.233]:18167 "EHLO mgw-mx06.nokia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757722Ab0FBKBt (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jun 2010 06:01:49 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100602.105054.59678037.Hiroshi.DOYU@nokia.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: "Doyu Hiroshi (Nokia-D/Helsinki)" Cc: Tony Lindgren , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , "h-kanigeri2@ti.com" On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 09:50:54AM +0200, Doyu Hiroshi (Nokia-D/Helsinki) wrote: > omap iommu: Introduce iopgd_is_table MACRO > omap iommu: Rename iopte_[p,v]addr -> iopte_page_[p,v]addr should these two be here or should they go to 2.6.36 merge window ? at least from the description it doesn't look like they are fixing any bugs. > omap iommu: add functionality to get TLB miss interrupt for this "add functionality to get TLB miss interrupt" the other two look suspicious looking only at the description. -- balbi DefectiveByDesign.org