From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Florian Mickler Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8) Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2010 23:34:39 +0200 Message-ID: <20100605233439.0ccbef82@schatten.dmk.lab> References: <201005302202.39511.rjw@sisk.pl> <201005312347.24251.rjw@sisk.pl> <1275471561.27810.30865.camel@twins> <20100605220143.08774900@schatten.dmk.lab> <20100605231141.52de0df7@schatten.dmk.lab> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Felipe Contreras , Arve =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Hj?= =?ISO-8859-15?Q?=F8nnev=E5g?= , Peter Zijlstra , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Matthew Garrett , Alan Stern , Paul@smtp1.linux-foundation.org, LKML , felipe.balbi@nokia.com, Linux OMAP Mailing List , Linux PM , Alan Cox List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 5 Jun 2010 23:24:40 +0200 (CEST) Thomas Gleixner wrote: > Stop that advertising campaing already. Stop advertising that there is no problem. > > No thanks, > > tglx Cheers, Flo (Sorry, crossfire. Caused by you answering in the wrong subthread. I know that you are engineering and not dismissing the problem. This was pointed at Felipes "There is no problem"/"suspend blockers don't do what they are designed to do well")