From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Florian Mickler Subject: Re: [linux-pm] suspend blockers & Android integration Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 17:56:04 +0200 Message-ID: <20100607175604.4c8f1fa4@schatten.dmk.lab> References: <20100606152946.GA11351@srcf.ucam.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from ist.d-labs.de ([213.239.218.44]:45384 "EHLO mx01.d-labs.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752303Ab0FGP4Y (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jun 2010 11:56:24 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Alan Stern Cc: Matthew Garrett , Vitaly Wool , Neil Brown , tytso@mit.edu, Peter Zijlstra , Brian Swetland , Felipe Balbi , LKML , James Bottomley , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Linux PM , Linux OMAP Mailing List , Linus Torvalds , Ingo Molnar , Alan Cox , Arjan van de Ven On Sun, 6 Jun 2010 20:01:56 -0400 (EDT) Alan Stern wrote: > And since Android can reach essentially the same low-power > state from idle as from suspend, it appears that they really don't need > any kernel changes at all. Well, perhaps a hint to the scheduler to fall through as fast as possible into deepest idle? > > Alan Stern > Cheers, Flo