From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Felipe Balbi Subject: Re: Future of resource framework? Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 22:31:48 +0300 Message-ID: <20100607193148.GA29354@nokia.com> References: <871vd5kxqg.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> <87hbljisi1.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> <5A47E75E594F054BAF48C5E4FC4B92AB0321623820@dbde02.ent.ti.com> Reply-To: felipe.balbi@nokia.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Return-path: Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([192.100.122.230]:41649 "EHLO mgw-mx03.nokia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754062Ab0FGTc6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jun 2010 15:32:58 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5A47E75E594F054BAF48C5E4FC4B92AB0321623820@dbde02.ent.ti.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: "ext Gadiyar, Anand" Cc: Kevin Hilman , Mike Chan , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , Paul Walmsley On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 05:01:49AM +0200, ext Gadiyar, Anand wrote: >What if a driver knows that it cannot afford to let the PM layer >turn off the power domain at certain points of time (maybe as long >as a USB cable is connected). How can this be specified in terms >of a latency or throughput constraint? > >Just curious, since I don't understand current OMAP3 PM code >as well as I would like to. that should be simple if you set latency to 10us or mpu frequency to 500MHz should do it. -- balbi DefectiveByDesign.org