From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Neil Brown Subject: Re: [linux-pm] suspend blockers & Android integration Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 15:10:55 +1000 Message-ID: <20100610151055.5a0870ba@notabene.brown> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:33466 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751797Ab0FJFLM convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jun 2010 01:11:12 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Arve =?UTF-8?B?SGrDuG5uZXbDpWc=?= Cc: david@lang.hm, Alan Stern , tytso@mit.edu, Alan Cox , Florian Mickler , Peter Zijlstra , Brian Swetland , "H. Peter Anvin" , LKML , James Bottomley , Linux PM , Thomas Gleixner , Linux OMAP Mailing List , Linus Torvalds , Ingo Molnar , Felipe Balbi , Arjan van de Ven On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 21:51:38 -0700 Arve Hj=C3=B8nnev=C3=A5g wrote: > The current user space interface does not require that clients > register the file descriptors that they get wakeup events from with > another process. >=20 However I believe they *do* register these file descriptors with the ke= rnel, via some sort of ioctl (I think you have said that is the case for inpu= t devices at least). Can you confirm that? If that is the case, is it really such a big change to register with an= other process instead of with the kernel? Thanks, NeilBrown -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html