From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Russell King - ARM Linux Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] OMAP: PM: initial runtime PM core support Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 21:06:59 +0100 Message-ID: <20100625200659.GB22090@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1277422991-25350-1-git-send-email-khilman@deeprootsystems.com> <1277422991-25350-2-git-send-email-khilman@deeprootsystems.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:55811 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753168Ab0FYUHO (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jun 2010 16:07:14 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Grant Likely Cc: Kevin Hilman , Eric Miao , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Nicolas Pitre On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 09:26:43AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote: > This approach is also not multiplatform friendly (cc'ing Eric and > Nicolas who are working on ARM multiplatform). It won't work for > building a kernel that supports, say, both versatile and OMAP. And I should also point out that multiplatform is not the answer to Linus' concerns. There's no way such work is going to be anywhere near complete come the next merge window. Note that the loss of the defconfigs will make the integration of multiplatform patches extremely time consuming and slow.