From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: OK to base some patches on lmb branch? Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2010 16:16:56 +0300 Message-ID: <20100802131653.GN12293@atomide.com> References: <20100707105213.GJ1920@atomide.com> <20100709144901.GK22845@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.71]:58265 "EHLO mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752720Ab0HBNQy (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Aug 2010 09:16:54 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100709144901.GK22845@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org * Russell King - ARM Linux [100709 17:42]: > On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 01:52:14PM +0300, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > Hi Russell, > > > > Is your lmb branch going to stay static? > > Not at the moment, I'm still tweaking things in there, and the main > lmb conversion commit needs a better description... I think there's > also a few bits missing from the discontigmem removal patch. Back online now from a vacation. I have separated the omap common map_io patches into a branch based on your lmb branch and merged into omap for-next. Will not merge into omap-for-linus until I have a confirmation from you it will stay static. Regards, Tony