From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Jacob Tanenbaum <Jacob.Tanenbaum@logicpd.com>,
Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: beginner questions on being added to the linux tree
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 09:50:47 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100810065046.GF32480@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100810110915.9e2ddc27.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
* Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> [100810 04:02]:
> Hi Jacob,
>
> On Mon, 9 Aug 2010 19:36:01 -0500 "Jacob Tanenbaum" <Jacob.Tanenbaum@logicpd.com> wrote:
> >
> > I work for LogicPD and am trying to add new support for
> > there OMAP3 development boards to the kernel, I have a working version
> > of some of the base support and was wondering how to get that ready to
> > be merged in during this merge window. We have tested the code against
> > the most recent version of linux-next I can get to build and was
> > wondering where to go. Do I send merge requests to the linux-next list
> > or a series of patches. I have sent patches to the omap and arm lists
> > and got some minor syntax errors reported by them (spaces instead of
> > tabs and the like) and was wondering where to go from here.
>
> I only merge other people's trees, so you need to set up a git tree
> somewhere and tell me (cc'ing linux-next and all other appropriate
> lists/people) where it is and which branch to fetch. I then fetch that
> branch each day and merge it with everything else.
>
> Getting your code merged by Linus during this merge window is up to Linus
> and Russell or Tony, I guess. But I cannot take new trees now until
> after -rc1 is out. So if you really want your code merged during this
> merge window, your best bet is to convince Russell and/or Tony.
Yeah, it's too late for this merge window. But after -rc1 I'll start
queuing things up for the next merge window. That way your patches will
go to Stephen's for-next tree and then get pulled into the mainline
tree during the next merge window.
> Having your tree in linux-next may be useful for ongoing development
> unless Tony thinks it may be better for you to just submit your code
> through his omap tree.
If you have patches coming on continuous basis, then maintaining
a git branch makes sense. For occasional sets of patches, it's probably
easier to just email them to the list.
Regards,
Tony
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-10 6:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <77A0A4DB5BF2A44283E5522C27234AC6021A5F78@EDPRSRV011.logicpd.com>
2010-08-10 1:09 ` beginner questions on being added to the linux tree Stephen Rothwell
2010-08-10 6:50 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100810065046.GF32480@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=Jacob.Tanenbaum@logicpd.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).