* Re: beginner questions on being added to the linux tree
[not found] <77A0A4DB5BF2A44283E5522C27234AC6021A5F78@EDPRSRV011.logicpd.com>
@ 2010-08-10 1:09 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-08-10 6:50 ` Tony Lindgren
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2010-08-10 1:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jacob Tanenbaum; +Cc: Russell King, Tony Lindgren, linux-omap
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1570 bytes --]
Hi Jacob,
On Mon, 9 Aug 2010 19:36:01 -0500 "Jacob Tanenbaum" <Jacob.Tanenbaum@logicpd.com> wrote:
>
> I work for LogicPD and am trying to add new support for
> there OMAP3 development boards to the kernel, I have a working version
> of some of the base support and was wondering how to get that ready to
> be merged in during this merge window. We have tested the code against
> the most recent version of linux-next I can get to build and was
> wondering where to go. Do I send merge requests to the linux-next list
> or a series of patches. I have sent patches to the omap and arm lists
> and got some minor syntax errors reported by them (spaces instead of
> tabs and the like) and was wondering where to go from here.
I only merge other people's trees, so you need to set up a git tree
somewhere and tell me (cc'ing linux-next and all other appropriate
lists/people) where it is and which branch to fetch. I then fetch that
branch each day and merge it with everything else.
Getting your code merged by Linus during this merge window is up to Linus
and Russell or Tony, I guess. But I cannot take new trees now until
after -rc1 is out. So if you really want your code merged during this
merge window, your best bet is to convince Russell and/or Tony.
Having your tree in linux-next may be useful for ongoing development
unless Tony thinks it may be better for you to just submit your code
through his omap tree.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: beginner questions on being added to the linux tree
2010-08-10 1:09 ` beginner questions on being added to the linux tree Stephen Rothwell
@ 2010-08-10 6:50 ` Tony Lindgren
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Tony Lindgren @ 2010-08-10 6:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell; +Cc: Jacob Tanenbaum, Russell King, linux-omap
* Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> [100810 04:02]:
> Hi Jacob,
>
> On Mon, 9 Aug 2010 19:36:01 -0500 "Jacob Tanenbaum" <Jacob.Tanenbaum@logicpd.com> wrote:
> >
> > I work for LogicPD and am trying to add new support for
> > there OMAP3 development boards to the kernel, I have a working version
> > of some of the base support and was wondering how to get that ready to
> > be merged in during this merge window. We have tested the code against
> > the most recent version of linux-next I can get to build and was
> > wondering where to go. Do I send merge requests to the linux-next list
> > or a series of patches. I have sent patches to the omap and arm lists
> > and got some minor syntax errors reported by them (spaces instead of
> > tabs and the like) and was wondering where to go from here.
>
> I only merge other people's trees, so you need to set up a git tree
> somewhere and tell me (cc'ing linux-next and all other appropriate
> lists/people) where it is and which branch to fetch. I then fetch that
> branch each day and merge it with everything else.
>
> Getting your code merged by Linus during this merge window is up to Linus
> and Russell or Tony, I guess. But I cannot take new trees now until
> after -rc1 is out. So if you really want your code merged during this
> merge window, your best bet is to convince Russell and/or Tony.
Yeah, it's too late for this merge window. But after -rc1 I'll start
queuing things up for the next merge window. That way your patches will
go to Stephen's for-next tree and then get pulled into the mainline
tree during the next merge window.
> Having your tree in linux-next may be useful for ongoing development
> unless Tony thinks it may be better for you to just submit your code
> through his omap tree.
If you have patches coming on continuous basis, then maintaining
a git branch makes sense. For occasional sets of patches, it's probably
easier to just email them to the list.
Regards,
Tony
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-08-10 6:51 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <77A0A4DB5BF2A44283E5522C27234AC6021A5F78@EDPRSRV011.logicpd.com>
2010-08-10 1:09 ` beginner questions on being added to the linux tree Stephen Rothwell
2010-08-10 6:50 ` Tony Lindgren
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).