From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Felipe Balbi Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] Introduce support for TI816X processor series Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 20:32:14 +0300 Message-ID: <20100811173214.GC21391@nokia.com> References: <1281546621-11348-1-git-send-email-hemantp@ti.com> Reply-To: felipe.balbi@nokia.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Return-path: Received: from mgw-sa02.nokia.com ([147.243.1.48]:36205 "EHLO mgw-sa02.nokia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757550Ab0HKRbw (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Aug 2010 13:31:52 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1281546621-11348-1-git-send-email-hemantp@ti.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: ext Hemant Pedanekar Cc: "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , "tony@atomide.com" , "khilman@deeprootsystems.com" Hi, On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 07:10:21PM +0200, ext Hemant Pedanekar wrote: >This patch series adds support for TI816X processor series. First device in this >series is DM8168 and details can be found at: > >http://www.ti.com/ww/en/dsp/davinci-netra/index.shtml > >This device is architecturally closer to the OMAP devices. Hence, these patches >are being submitted on linux-omap. Yeah, I was wondering why is this coming to linux-omap tree. What's the actual core in it ? Is it based on some OMAP revision instead ? It would be cool to know what's similar and what's difference between e.g. omap3430 and ti816x or to which omap revision is this being compared to. I believe Tony will have more comments to this ?!? -- balbi DefectiveByDesign.org