From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Russell King - ARM Linux Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Hacks to allow booting ARM SMP kernel on UP ARMv7 Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 16:40:35 +0100 Message-ID: <20100817154035.GD20325@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20100817104414.19061.38999.stgit@baageli.muru.com> <20100817135205.GC20325@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20100817141210.GJ12184@atomide.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:45914 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757467Ab0HQPkq (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Aug 2010 11:40:46 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100817141210.GJ12184@atomide.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Tony Lindgren Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, bryan.wu@canonical.com On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 05:12:11PM +0300, Tony Lindgren wrote: > Great, will give it a try hopefully tomorrow. Sounds like that's the way > to deal with fixing up things when booting up older UP ARMv6 without the > 32v6 support :) What I've also been debating about is adding another word to the smpalt structure, that being a set of flags which denote the situation where the alternative should be used. That means we can use it to do individual word replacements for SMP vs UP, ARMv6 vs ARMv6k etc.