From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Russell King - ARM Linux Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] ARM: Use SMP and UP macros for cacheflush Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2010 11:57:50 +0100 Message-ID: <20100904105750.GC12674@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20100819073810.GR12184@atomide.com> <4C6CFBAF.6020407@canonical.com> <20100819095705.GU12184@atomide.com> <20100819102025.GA32151@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20100820120622.GL25742@atomide.com> <20100830225527.GC11597@atomide.com> <20100902133637.GJ26319@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20100902161659.GJ11597@atomide.com> <20100902161940.GL11597@atomide.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:51875 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753256Ab0IDK6B (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Sep 2010 06:58:01 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: "Shilimkar, Santosh" Cc: Tony Lindgren , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Bryan Wu , Will Deacon On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 05:27:25PM +0530, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote: > Since UP/SMP both cases are handled, the above patch can be something > like this now... No - this results in the instruction used for ARMv6 SMP systems being changed to the ARMv7 instruction, which probably won't work.