From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: [RFC 1/5] OMAP: mux: Add support for control module split in several partitions Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 13:06:48 -0700 Message-ID: <20100927200647.GA4211@atomide.com> References: <1285319748-28976-1-git-send-email-b-cousson@ti.com> <1285319748-28976-2-git-send-email-b-cousson@ti.com> <20100925002228.GP4211@atomide.com> <20100927154611.GT4211@atomide.com> <4CA0D33C.303@ti.com> <20100927173604.GY4211@atomide.com> <4CA0F883.3030302@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.72]:60571 "EHLO mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932927Ab0I0UGm (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Sep 2010 16:06:42 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4CA0F883.3030302@ti.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: "Cousson, Benoit" Cc: "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , Paul Walmsley , Kevin Hilman , "Shilimkar, Santosh" * Cousson, Benoit [100927 12:54]: > > >OK cool, let me know if I can help with something. > > Thanks, but that should be fine for moment. I think I should have > the updated version before the end of the week. OK > Just one clarification, I don't think we have to use two different > macros in that case. The names are already unique across partition > today, so we can use only macro like for previous OMAP. OK > I'm just glad I don't have to re-write these 231 entries per ES manually :-) :) > I'll give it a try, and keep you inform if I have any un-expected > issue with that approach. OK Tony