From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: Dropping omap3430 ES1.0 support in mainline Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 14:58:32 -0700 Message-ID: <20101001215832.GC3117@atomide.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.72]:52299 "EHLO mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755065Ab0JAV6i (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Oct 2010 17:58:38 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Anand Gadiyar Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org * Anand Gadiyar [101001 14:38]: > Tony, all, > > The OMAP3430 ES1.0 was pretty much a test chip, with the only known board > being the 3430ES1.0 SDP. There are only a small number of these boards > outside TI and within TI, they've likely never been used in over 2 years. > It's unlikely that these boards still work on mainline, and likely have > been broken in linux-omap since the very beginning. > > Between ES1.0 and ES2.0 we've had several major changes in the clock > nodes, > and IPs. However we're still keeping code/data on these in the kernel > today. > > Since all later OMAP3 chips have been very similar to ES2.0, it probably > makes sense to drop support for the ES1.0. This would result in a small > but probably significant reduction in the current code. If you're okay > with dropping this support, we can slowly start working on this. > > What do you think? No thanks! Tony