From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Samuel Ortiz Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] TWL IRQ: Fix fucntion declaration warnings Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 11:06:14 +0200 Message-ID: <20101019090613.GA2736@sortiz-mobl> References: <1286315819-5906-1-git-send-email-manjugk@ti.com> <1286315819-5906-4-git-send-email-manjugk@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:31347 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757893Ab0JSJG1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Oct 2010 05:06:27 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1286315819-5906-4-git-send-email-manjugk@ti.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: "G, Manjunath Kondaiah" Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Tony Lindgren , Nishanth Menon Hi Manjunath, On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 03:26:59AM +0530, G, Manjunath Kondaiah wrote: > Fixes following sparse warnings for twl4030 and twl6030 irq files. > > drivers/mfd/twl4030-irq.c:783:5: warning: symbol 'twl4030_init_irq' was not declared. Should it be static? > drivers/mfd/twl4030-irq.c:863:5: warning: symbol 'twl4030_exit_irq' was not declared. Should it be static? > drivers/mfd/twl4030-irq.c:873:5: warning: symbol 'twl4030_init_chip_irq' was not declared. Should it be static? > > drivers/mfd/twl6030-irq.c:226:5: warning: symbol 'twl6030_init_irq' was not declared. Should it be static? > drivers/mfd/twl6030-irq.c:290:5: warning: symbol 'twl6030_exit_irq' was not declared. Should it be static? > Patch applied, thanks. Cheers, Samuel. -- Intel Open Source Technology Centre http://oss.intel.com/