From: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
To: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "G, Manjunath Kondaiah" <manjugk@ti.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] TWL IRQ: Fix fucntion declaration warnings
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 11:28:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101019092816.GD11713@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101019090613.GA2736@sortiz-mobl>
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 11:06:14AM +0200, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> Hi Manjunath,
>
> On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 03:26:59AM +0530, G, Manjunath Kondaiah wrote:
> > Fixes following sparse warnings for twl4030 and twl6030 irq files.
> >
> > drivers/mfd/twl4030-irq.c:783:5: warning: symbol 'twl4030_init_irq' was not declared. Should it be static?
> > drivers/mfd/twl4030-irq.c:863:5: warning: symbol 'twl4030_exit_irq' was not declared. Should it be static?
> > drivers/mfd/twl4030-irq.c:873:5: warning: symbol 'twl4030_init_chip_irq' was not declared. Should it be static?
> >
> > drivers/mfd/twl6030-irq.c:226:5: warning: symbol 'twl6030_init_irq' was not declared. Should it be static?
> > drivers/mfd/twl6030-irq.c:290:5: warning: symbol 'twl6030_exit_irq' was not declared. Should it be static?
> >
> Patch applied, thanks.
I didn't get the original patch, so I just now noticed the typo in the
Subject. You might want to do s/fucntion/function/
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-19 9:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-05 21:56 [PATCH v3] OMAP: NAND: Fix static declaration warning G, Manjunath Kondaiah
2010-10-05 21:56 ` [PATCH v3] OMAP2: onenand: Fix static function warnings G, Manjunath Kondaiah
2010-10-05 21:56 ` [PATCH v3] OMAP2/3: NAND: Convert write/read functions to raw read/write G, Manjunath Kondaiah
2010-10-11 18:59 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2010-10-05 21:56 ` [PATCH v3] TWL IRQ: Fix fucntion declaration warnings G, Manjunath Kondaiah
2010-10-12 5:36 ` G, Manjunath Kondaiah
2010-10-19 9:06 ` Samuel Ortiz
2010-10-19 9:28 ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2010-10-19 10:33 ` Samuel Ortiz
2010-10-07 17:35 ` [PATCH v3] OMAP: NAND: Fix static declaration warning Vimal Singh
2010-10-11 18:58 ` Artem Bityutskiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101019092816.GD11713@pengutronix.de \
--to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manjugk@ti.com \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox