From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] OMAP3 PM: move omap3 sleep to ddr Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 10:13:41 -0800 Message-ID: <20101118181341.GH9264@atomide.com> References: <1290091906-32539-1-git-send-email-j-pihet@ti.com> <1290091906-32539-2-git-send-email-j-pihet@ti.com> <87tyjey6h3.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> <4CE55A88.6010300@ti.com> <20101118175215.GE9264@atomide.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.72]:38503 "EHLO mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760083Ab0KRSNt (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Nov 2010 13:13:49 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101118175215.GE9264@atomide.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Nishanth Menon Cc: Kevin Hilman , Jean Pihet , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Vishwanath Sripathy , Jean Pihet-XID * Tony Lindgren [101118 09:42]: > * Nishanth Menon [101118 08:46]: > > > > But after wfi in wait_sdrc_ok as part of the code executing in SRAM > > today omap34xx_cpu_suspend -> we are waiting for DPLL3 lock prior to > > accessing DDR -> how do we execute that logic in SDRAM? > > I too am a bit concerned how this will all keep working. For light > testing it may be running OK if it happens to run from cache.. This in the retention case, in off-idle those should be powered down.. Tony