From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: [RFC v2 5/8] TILER-DMM: TILER interface file and documentation Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 16:53:32 -0800 Message-ID: <20101201005332.GA29171@kroah.com> References: <1291147139-23472-1-git-send-email-davidsin@ti.com> <1291147139-23472-6-git-send-email-davidsin@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1291147139-23472-6-git-send-email-davidsin@ti.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: David Sin Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Lajos Molnar List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 01:58:56PM -0600, David Sin wrote: > From: Lajos Molnar > > This patch contains the TILER interface file and the documentation. > > Signed-off-by: Lajos Molnar > Signed-off-by: David Sin > --- > Documentation/arm/OMAP/TILER | 126 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > arch/arm/mach-omap2/include/mach/tiler.h | 173 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Shouldn't this .h file be in include/linux/ instead? Why is it arch specific? thanks, greg k-h