From: "Peter 'p2' De Schrijver" <peter.de-schrijver@nokia.com>
To: ext Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@newoldbits.com>
Cc: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
linux-omap <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arm <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Kevin <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>, Tony <tony@atomide.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/7] OMAP3: PM: Erratum i581 support: dll kick strategy
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 13:33:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101220113322.GS31404@nokia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=4DJAnXcTZ37rcmr9Kz2CmXx6uhPqNThnoR2gu@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 11:23:27AM +0100, ext Jean Pihet wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 11:53 PM, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> wrote:
> > From: Peter 'p2' De Schrijver <peter.de-schrijver@nokia.com>
> >
> > Erratum i581 impacts OMAP3 platforms.
> > PRCM DPLL control FSM removes SDRC_IDLEREQ before DPLL3 locks causing
> > the DPLL not to be locked at times.
> >
> > IMPORTANT:
> > *) This is not a complete workaround implementation as recommended
> > by the silicon erratum. this is a support logic for detecting lockups and
> > attempting to recover where possible and is known to provide stability
> > in multiple platforms.
> > *) This code is mostly important for inactive and retention. The ROM code
> > waits for the maximum dll lock time when resuming from off mode. So for
> > off mode this code isn't really needed.
> >
> > This should eventually get refactored as part of cleanups to sleep34xx.S
> >
> > Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
> > Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peter 'p2' De Schrijver <peter.de-schrijver@nokia.com>
> > ---
> > (no change done, posting for completeness of the series)
> > v2: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/365252/
> > typo correction- erratum, support, added comment from Peter from the
> > thread to commit message
> > v1: http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=129013172525234&w=2
> > arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep34xx.S | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > 1 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep34xx.S b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep34xx.S
> > index 2c20fcf..3fbd1e5 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep34xx.S
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sleep34xx.S
> > @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
> > OMAP3430_PM_PREPWSTST)
> > #define PM_PWSTCTRL_MPU_P OMAP3430_PRM_BASE + MPU_MOD + OMAP2_PM_PWSTCTRL
> > #define CM_IDLEST1_CORE_V OMAP34XX_CM_REGADDR(CORE_MOD, CM_IDLEST1)
> > +#define CM_IDLEST_CKGEN_V OMAP34XX_CM_REGADDR(PLL_MOD, CM_IDLEST)
> > #define SRAM_BASE_P 0x40200000
> > #define CONTROL_STAT 0x480022F0
> > #define SCRATCHPAD_MEM_OFFS 0x310 /* Move this as correct place is
> > @@ -554,31 +555,67 @@ skip_l2_inval:
> >
> > /* Make sure SDRC accesses are ok */
> > wait_sdrc_ok:
> > +
> > +/* DPLL3 must be locked before accessing the SDRC. Maybe the HW ensures this. */
> > + ldr r4, cm_idlest_ckgen
> > +wait_dpll3_lock:
> > + ldr r5, [r4]
> > + tst r5, #1
> > + beq wait_dpll3_lock
> > +
> > ldr r4, cm_idlest1_core
> > +wait_sdrc_ready:
> > ldr r5, [r4]
> > - and r5, r5, #0x2
> > - cmp r5, #0
> > - bne wait_sdrc_ok
> > + tst r5, #0x2
> > + bne wait_sdrc_ready
> > + /* allow DLL powerdown upon hw idle req */
> > ldr r4, sdrc_power
> > ldr r5, [r4]
> > bic r5, r5, #0x40
> > str r5, [r4]
> > -wait_dll_lock:
> > +is_dll_in_lock_mode:
> > +
> > /* Is dll in lock mode? */
> > ldr r4, sdrc_dlla_ctrl
> > ldr r5, [r4]
> > tst r5, #0x4
> > bxne lr
> > /* wait till dll locks */
> > - ldr r4, sdrc_dlla_status
> > +wait_dll_lock_timed:
> > + ldr r4, wait_dll_lock_counter
> > + add r4, r4, #1
> > + str r4, wait_dll_lock_counter
> > + ldr r4, sdrc_dlla_status
> > + mov r6, #8 /* Wait 20uS for lock */
> > +wait_dll_lock:
> > + subs r6, r6, #0x1
> > + beq kick_dll
>
> It would be good to have more comments on the code flow here:
> - what are wait_dll_lock_counter and kick_counter used for?
For debugging and statistics. So you can find out how many times a
'kick' was needed.
> - what is the timing based on? Why 20uS for the wait time?
This is the maximum lock time of the dll according to TI for OMAP3430.
> - jumping back and forth to kick_dll and wait_dll_lock_timed is confusing.
>
> > ldr r5, [r4]
> > and r5, r5, #0x4
> > cmp r5, #0x4
> > bne wait_dll_lock
> > bx lr
> >
> > + /* disable/reenable DLL if not locked */
> > +kick_dll:
> > + ldr r4, sdrc_dlla_ctrl
> > + ldr r5, [r4]
> > + mov r6, r5
> > + bic r6, #(1<<3) /* disable dll */
> > + str r6, [r4]
> > + dsb
> > + orr r6, r6, #(1<<3) /* enable dll */
> > + str r6, [r4]
> > + dsb
> > + ldr r4, kick_counter
> > + add r4, r4, #1
> > + str r4, kick_counter
> > + b wait_dll_lock_timed
> > +
> > cm_idlest1_core:
> > .word CM_IDLEST1_CORE_V
> > +cm_idlest_ckgen:
> > + .word CM_IDLEST_CKGEN_V
> > sdrc_dlla_status:
> > .word SDRC_DLLA_STATUS_V
> > sdrc_dlla_ctrl:
> > @@ -615,5 +652,10 @@ control_stat:
> > .word CONTROL_STAT
> > kernel_flush:
> > .word v7_flush_dcache_all
> > + /* these 2 words need to be at the end !!! */
> > +kick_counter:
> > + .word 0
> > +wait_dll_lock_counter:
> > + .word 0
> Why do they need to be at the end? Also, at the end of what do they need to be?
>
At the end of omap34xx_cpu_suspend. As we don't know where in SRAM the
counters will be, the code accessing those counters addresses them
relative from (_omap_sram_idle + omap34xx_cpu_suspend_sz). Not sure if
this part of the code made it to linux-omap though.
Cheers,
Peter.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-20 11:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-18 22:53 [PATCH v4 0/7] OMAP: idle path errata fixes Nishanth Menon
2010-12-18 22:53 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] OMAP3: PM: Update clean_l2 to use v7_flush_dcache_all Nishanth Menon
2010-12-20 6:43 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2010-12-20 10:19 ` Jean Pihet
2010-12-18 22:53 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] OMAP3: PM: Erratum i581 support: dll kick strategy Nishanth Menon
2010-12-20 6:47 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2010-12-20 14:16 ` Nishanth Menon
2010-12-20 10:23 ` Jean Pihet
2010-12-20 11:33 ` Peter 'p2' De Schrijver [this message]
2010-12-20 14:21 ` Nishanth Menon
2010-12-18 22:53 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] omap3: pm: introduce errata handling Nishanth Menon
2010-12-20 10:18 ` Jean Pihet
2010-12-20 14:39 ` Nishanth Menon
2010-12-18 22:53 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] OMAP3630: PM: Erratum i608: disable RTA Nishanth Menon
2010-12-20 6:59 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2010-12-20 11:23 ` Nishanth Menon
2010-12-20 12:15 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2010-12-20 10:27 ` Jean Pihet
2010-12-20 14:45 ` Nishanth Menon
2010-12-18 22:53 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] OMAP3630: PM: Disable L2 cache while invalidating L2 cache Nishanth Menon
2010-12-20 7:13 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2010-12-20 11:44 ` Nishanth Menon
2010-12-20 12:14 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2010-12-20 13:08 ` Nishanth Menon
2010-12-20 13:29 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2010-12-20 13:33 ` Nishanth Menon
2010-12-20 13:37 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2010-12-20 10:28 ` Jean Pihet
2010-12-18 22:53 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] OMAP3: PM: make omap3_cpuidle_update_states independent of enable_off_mode Nishanth Menon
2010-12-20 7:16 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2010-12-20 10:28 ` Jean Pihet
2010-12-18 22:53 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] OMAP3630: PM: Erratum i583: disable coreoff if < ES1.2 Nishanth Menon
2010-12-20 6:51 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2010-12-20 10:26 ` Jean Pihet
2010-12-20 11:22 ` Nishanth Menon
2010-12-20 19:05 ` Kevin Hilman
2010-12-20 19:07 ` Nishanth Menon
2010-12-20 10:17 ` [PATCH v4 0/7] OMAP: idle path errata fixes Jean Pihet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101220113322.GS31404@nokia.com \
--to=peter.de-schrijver@nokia.com \
--cc=jean.pihet@newoldbits.com \
--cc=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox