From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: [PATCH 26/30] mmc: update workqueue usages Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 11:54:48 -0800 Message-ID: <20110110195448.GJ4957@atomide.com> References: <1292086307-19211-27-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <20110109023058.GA17232@void.printf.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.71]:14118 "EHLO mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751931Ab1AJTy4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jan 2011 14:54:56 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110109023058.GA17232@void.printf.net> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Chris Ball Cc: Jarkko Lavinen , Madhusudhan Chikkature , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Hi, * Chris Ball [110108 18:33]: > Hi linux-omap folks, > > I'd like to merge this patch via the MMC tree; please review/ACK. > > Thanks, > > - Chris. > > From: Tejun Heo > > Workqueue creation API has been updated and flush_scheduled_work() is > deprecated and scheduled to be removed. > > * core/core.c: Use alloc_ordered_workqueue() instead of > create_singlethread_workqueue(). This removes an unnecessary > rescuer. > > * host/omap.c: Create, use and flush mmc_omap_wq instead of the > system_wq. > > * Flush host->mmc_carddetect_work directly on removal instead of using > flush_scheduled_work(). > > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo > Cc: Chris Ball > Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org > --- > This is part of a series to remove flush_scheduled_work() usage to > prepare for deprecation of flush_scheduled_work(). Patches in this > series are self contained and mostly straight-forward. > > Please feel free to take it into the appropriate tree, or just ack it. > In the latter case, I'll merge the patch through the workqueue tree > during the next merge window. Seems to work just fine, tested on n800 for omap.c and omap4 panda for omap_hsmmc.c. Please feel free to queue via workqueue tree as long as the MMC people are fine with that: Tested-by: Tony Lindgren