From: Jamie Iles <jamie@jamieiles.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC+CFT] Use word operations in bitops
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 09:46:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110117094602.GA2622@pulham.picochip.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110116121911.GB27542@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 12:19:11PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> XXX WARNING: bitops are used heavily by filesystem code: there be dragons XXX
> I strongly suggest you ensure you have a copy of your filesystems before
> trying this patch.
>
> The patch below switches the bitops to use word loads/stores rather than
> byte operations - so that we can avoid using the ldrexb/strexb instructions
> which are only supported from ARMv6k and up.
[...]
> This does need a fair amount of testing before it can be merged, so I'd
> like to see a number of Tested-by's against this patch. Please also
> indicate whether you tested on LE or BE or both, which filesystems, and
> whether they were read-only mounted or read-write mounted.
Hi Russell,
I've tested these on my picoxcell board (ARMv6K UP LE) with UBIFS, JFFS2
and NFS all mounted rw and haven't seen any problems. Our platforms
aren't particulary FS intensive so I'll keep these patches applied to
give them a bit more time.
Tested-by: Jamie Iles <jamie@jamieiles.com>
Jamie
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-17 9:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-16 12:19 [RFC+CFT] Use word operations in bitops Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-16 18:15 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 11:03 ` Jamie Iles
2011-01-17 9:46 ` Jamie Iles [this message]
2011-01-17 10:08 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-01-17 10:46 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-18 15:32 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-01-18 15:43 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-18 15:58 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-01-18 16:28 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110117094602.GA2622@pulham.picochip.com \
--to=jamie@jamieiles.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox