From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: [PATCH] change acquire/release_console_sem() to console_lock/unlock() Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 08:34:48 -0800 Message-ID: <20110120163448.GA30588@suse.de> References: <1295539104-13210-1-git-send-email-torbenh@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1295539104-13210-1-git-send-email-torbenh@gmx.de> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Torben Hohn Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Kees Cook , linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, Sascha Hauer , James Hogan , David Airlie , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Jesse Barnes , James Morris , Grant Likely , Paul Mackerras , linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, Magnus Damm , Jiri Slaby , Dan Williams , devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, Guy Martin , Kuninori Morimoto , Jeremy Fitzhardinge , Russell King , Thomas Gleixner , Wu List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 04:58:13PM +0100, Torben Hohn wrote: > the -rt patches change the console_semaphore to console_mutex. > so a quite large chunk of the patches changes all > acquire/release_console_sem() to acquire/release_console_mutex() Why not just change the functionality of the existing function to be a mutex in the rt patches, instead of having to rename it everywhere? > this commit makes things use more neutral function names > which dont make implications about the underlying lock. > > the only real change is the return value of console_trylock > which is inverted from try_acquire_console_sem() > > Signed-off-by: Torben Hohn > CC: Thomas Gleixner I don't mind this rename, but is it really going to help anything out? What's the odds of the -rt portion of this patch ever making it to mainline? thanks, greg k-h