From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Felipe Balbi Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] OMAP: Basic DVFS Framework Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 19:18:05 +0200 Message-ID: <20110122171805.GA14774@legolas.emea.dhcp.ti.com> References: <1295618465-15234-1-git-send-email-vishwanath.bs@ti.com> Reply-To: balbi@ti.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from na3sys009aog104.obsmtp.com ([74.125.149.73]:45307 "EHLO na3sys009aog104.obsmtp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751515Ab1AVRSL (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Jan 2011 12:18:11 -0500 Received: by mail-iy0-f169.google.com with SMTP id 17so2823248iyj.14 for ; Sat, 22 Jan 2011 09:18:11 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1295618465-15234-1-git-send-email-vishwanath.bs@ti.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Vishwanath BS Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, patches@linaro.org Hi, On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 07:30:52PM +0530, Vishwanath BS wrote: > This patch series introduces support for Dynamic Voltage and Frequency Scaling > (DVFS) for OMAP devices. > > For detailed design details, refer to DVFS Documentation. If this is supposed to be used by drivers I would rather not as it's yet another OMAP-specific API to use. Before you reply with "you can pass function pointers via platform_data" let me say that even that is a burden, specially on devices which are used by several archs. Why don't you make it more generic like the OPP layer was created ? Isn't it better to just build on top of the OPP layer and make this one also generic ? -- balbi