From: Jarkko Nikula <jhnikula@gmail.com>
To: "Gulati, Shweta" <shweta.gulati@ti.com>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Thara Gopinath <thara@ti.com>,
Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] OMAP3: PM: Set/clear T2 bit for Smartreflex on TWL
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 13:45:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110216134523.ba5d3917.jhnikula@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=3PCBOvFtd1T-=tDjXcs+_0opKqxVps+StCZqf@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 11:22:09 +0530
"Gulati, Shweta" <shweta.gulati@ti.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 8:59 PM, Jarkko Nikula <jhnikula@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Probably discussed earlier but would it make more sense to have flag in
> > struct twl4030_platform_data and to do registers writes in twl-core?
> > Looks suspicious to have i2c_writes under arch/arm/.
> twl_i2c_read/write APIs are used from arch/arm in many board files,
> so I think it should not cause any issue.
Not good either e.g. in modularization point of view. I was thinking
something like below. I played safe and let the SR to be enabled only if
the twl4030_power_data.sr_enable is set. I read that Kevin had problems
earlier with 2430SDP if SR was enabled.
Note proof of concept patch only. I omitted the comments and don't do
explicit SR disable and I'd clean up the error paths in twl4030_power_init
a bit before this (e.g. printing error codes). Not sure either is the
twl4030-power.c right place for this or core.
--
Jarkko
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/twl4030-power.c b/drivers/mfd/twl4030-power.c
index 16422de0..e767b0f 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/twl4030-power.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/twl4030-power.c
@@ -92,6 +92,9 @@ static u8 twl4030_start_script_address = 0x2b;
#define OFF_STATE_SHIFT 4
#define OFF_STATE_MASK (0xf << OFF_STATE_SHIFT)
+#define TWL4030_DCDC_GLOBAL_CFG PHY_TO_OFF_PM_RECEIVER(0x61)
+#define SMARTREFLEX_ENABLE BIT(3)
+
static u8 res_config_addrs[] = {
[RES_VAUX1] = 0x17,
[RES_VAUX2] = 0x1b,
@@ -510,6 +513,22 @@ int twl4030_remove_script(u8 flags)
return err;
}
+int __init twl4030_sr_enable(void)
+{
+ u8 temp;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = twl_i2c_read_u8(TWL4030_MODULE_PM_RECEIVER, &temp,
+ TWL4030_DCDC_GLOBAL_CFG);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ temp |= SMARTREFLEX_ENABLE;
+
+ return twl_i2c_write_u8(TWL4030_MODULE_PM_RECEIVER, temp,
+ TWL4030_DCDC_GLOBAL_CFG);
+}
+
void __init twl4030_power_init(struct twl4030_power_data *twl4030_scripts)
{
int err = 0;
@@ -549,8 +568,15 @@ void __init twl4030_power_init(struct twl4030_power_data *twl4030_scripts)
err = twl_i2c_write_u8(TWL4030_MODULE_PM_MASTER, 0,
TWL4030_PM_MASTER_PROTECT_KEY);
- if (err)
+ if (err) {
pr_err("TWL4030 Unable to relock registers\n");
+ return;
+ }
+
+ if (twl4030_scripts->sr_enable)
+ err = twl4030_sr_enable();
+ if (err)
+ pr_err("TWL4030 Unable to set smartreflex. %d\n", err);
return;
unlock:
diff --git a/include/linux/i2c/twl.h b/include/linux/i2c/twl.h
index 61b9609..1f64e3e 100644
--- a/include/linux/i2c/twl.h
+++ b/include/linux/i2c/twl.h
@@ -630,6 +630,7 @@ struct twl4030_power_data {
struct twl4030_script **scripts;
unsigned num;
struct twl4030_resconfig *resource_config;
+ bool sr_enable; /* Smartreflex enable state */
#define TWL4030_RESCONFIG_UNDEF ((u8)-1)
};
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-16 11:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-15 7:58 [PATCH V4] OMAP3: PM: Set/clear T2 bit for Smartreflex on TWL Shweta Gulati
2011-02-15 15:16 ` Jarkko Nikula
2011-02-15 15:29 ` Jarkko Nikula
2011-02-16 5:52 ` Gulati, Shweta
2011-02-16 11:45 ` Jarkko Nikula [this message]
2011-02-16 11:54 ` Gulati, Shweta
2011-02-16 12:31 ` Jarkko Nikula
2011-02-16 12:47 ` Gulati, Shweta
2011-02-15 16:30 ` Vishwanath Sripathy
2011-02-16 5:44 ` Gulati, Shweta
2011-03-03 0:31 ` Kevin Hilman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-02-04 5:47 Shweta Gulati
2011-02-12 10:40 ` Menon, Nishanth
2011-02-14 22:24 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-02-15 3:18 ` Nishanth Menon
2011-02-14 22:24 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-02-14 22:26 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-02-14 22:30 ` Kevin Hilman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110216134523.ba5d3917.jhnikula@gmail.com \
--to=jhnikula@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=shweta.gulati@ti.com \
--cc=thara@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox