From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/5] OMAP4: hwmod data: add mailbox data Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 15:39:09 -0800 Message-ID: <20110217233908.GG20795@atomide.com> References: <1296674843-12718-1-git-send-email-omar.ramirez@ti.com> <1296674843-12718-4-git-send-email-omar.ramirez@ti.com> <4D5943A9.8010205@ti.com> <4D5AF8BA.8080403@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.72]:53292 "EHLO mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753302Ab1BQXjV (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Feb 2011 18:39:21 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: "Ramirez Luna, Omar" Cc: "Cousson, Benoit" , Russell King , lo , lak * Ramirez Luna, Omar [110215 16:11]: > > > If you have to do several platform_get_irq_byname to get this one, I'd > > prefer to get rid of that name for OMAP4. It will make mailbox irq > > consistent with the other hwmods. > > I was thinking to standardize the names to be mbox0..mboxN across all > the platforms, reason being that the mailbox also has capabilities to > be used not only by dsp or iva, by using a polling method. > > So even if the mailbox in OMAP3 is called "dsp", it has 4 more queues > apart from the 2 used for messaging between arm and dsp, that could be > used even if tidspbridge wasn't there. So what's the status of this series? Can the rest of the patches now be applied on top of the current omap-for-linus or do the names still need fixing? Tony