From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5 v3] usb: musb: Power management support Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 13:22:28 -0800 Message-ID: <20110228212227.GK20560@atomide.com> References: <1298882976-4997-1-git-send-email-hemahk@ti.com> <20110228085611.GL2459@legolas.emea.dhcp.ti.com> <20110228142030.GA25724@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.71]:57767 "EHLO mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755194Ab1B1VWe (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Feb 2011 16:22:34 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110228142030.GA25724@kroah.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Greg KH Cc: Felipe Balbi , Hema HK , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org * Greg KH [110228 06:21]: > On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 10:56:11AM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 02:19:31PM +0530, Hema HK wrote: > > > > > > There is some problem with idle path offmode in mainline, I could not test > > > with offmode. But I have tested this patch with resetting the controller > > > in the idle path when wakeup from retention just to make sure that the > > > context is lost, and restore path is working fine. > > > > Tony and Greg, how do we handle this one ? Who should take my pull request > > for this series ? I hope we still have a little time to get this into > > 2.6.39, but if we don't I can hold on to them until 2.6.40. > > Doesn't bother me which tree they go through, I can take them, or, if > it's easier due to omap merges, Tony can. I prefer Greg's queue unless there's some dependency issue to the patches we have in omap-for-linus. Tony