From: Jarkko Nikula <jhnikula@gmail.com>
To: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>,
Tero Kristo <tero.kristo@nokia.com>,
"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
Vishwanath BS <vishwanath.bs@ti.com>
Subject: Re: VDD2 OPP and DSS
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 09:18:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110302091820.0ffd5c5e.jhnikula@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1299048012.2226.10.camel@deskari>
On Wed, 2 Mar 2011 08:40:12 +0200
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com> wrote:
> Hi Paul and Tero,
>
> Some months ago there were discussions in Nokia about the problem with
> VDD2 OPP and DSS fck. The problem was (if I recall right) that the
> lowest VDD2 OPP cannot be used if DSS fck is over some certain limit (it
> was around 100MHz). If I understood correctly, this was also discussed
> with Paul.
>
> Do you remember this (and did I remember it right =)? What is the status
> of this?
>
At least lower OPP breaks DSS on N900 and Beagle if display is on while
entering into lower OPP.
This made me thinking that should initial round of
"[PATCH 10/13] OMAP3: Add voltage dependency table for VDD1."
use only OMAP3430_VDD_CORE_OPP3_UV for core voltage until there's some
dynamic/DSS voltage domain support in DSS?
http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=129889365901937&w=2
That way, I believe, the DVFS has shorter path to mainline and makes
easier to add driver specific support & hooks. DVFS is not only power
savings but users are interesting about additional performance too.
https://bugs.meego.com/show_bug.cgi?id=13833
--
Jarkko
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-02 7:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-02 6:40 VDD2 OPP and DSS Tomi Valkeinen
2011-03-02 7:18 ` Jarkko Nikula [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110302091820.0ffd5c5e.jhnikula@gmail.com \
--to=jhnikula@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
--cc=tero.kristo@nokia.com \
--cc=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
--cc=vishwanath.bs@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox