From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jamie Iles Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 0/3] Introduce the /proc/socinfo and use it to export OMAP data Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 15:18:14 +0000 Message-ID: <20110302151814.GA2919@pulham.picochip.com> References: <4D6D9D06.2020204@bluewatersys.com> <4D6D9FC7.1090206@codeaurora.org> <4D6DA290.2010607@bluewatersys.com> <4D6DAA24.3000204@codeaurora.org> <4D6DAE6E.4030701@bluewatersys.com> <4D6DB1B1.4060908@codeaurora.org> <4D6DFE67.3020801@stericsson.com> <20110302113823.GB2728@pulham.picochip.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-arm-kernel-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Linus Walleij Cc: ext Nishanth Menon , ext Tony Lindgren , Peter De-Schrijver , Ambresh , Saravana Kannan , Jouni Hogander , Jamie Iles , Lee Jones , Rabin VINCENT , Russell King , Jonas ABERG , ext Kevin Hilman , David Brown , Maxime Coquelin , "linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" , Loic PALLARDY , "eduardo.valentin@nokia.com" , Ryan Mallon , Linux-OMAP , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 03:42:33PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > 2011/3/2 Jamie Iles : > = > >> > /sys/devices/system/soc/ > >> > /sys/devices/system/soc/unique_id<- Unified way to export an ID for = all machs > >> > >> Arbitrary number of bits? Some will have a 64-bit ID, some will have 3= 2-bit > >> etc. > >> > >> Should we say it's a hex string of 64 bits? > > > > Could we provide hooks for the platform that takes the buffer and length > > and let the platform do the snprintf()? =A0Our devices have a 128-bit > > serial number and I'm sure there must be others. > = > Isn't it better to just make it 64-bit so that apps can always parse it, > and then you can have your high-res numbers under mach? > = > If there is no solid ABI for this there is no point to make it > generic under /soc/unique_id at all. I guess I'd argue that a arbitrary length hex string could be considered = as a solid ABI but you're right that it's probably more important to get = something out there and I'm probably being too picky, so apologies! Jamie