From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] omap changes for v2.6.39 merge window Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 15:14:10 -0700 Message-ID: <20110330221410.GK18334@atomide.com> References: <20110317183048.GW7258@atomide.com> <20110318101512.GA15375@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <201103301906.42429.arnd@arndb.de> <20110330210726.GA4593@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110330210726.GA4593@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-arm-kernel-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Nicolas Pitre , Catalin Marinas , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Brown , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org * Russell King - ARM Linux [110330 14:05]: > On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 07:06:41PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > And I have got to the point of just not giving a damn. I can't change > the ARM community (I've tried over the years to get more active review > of platform changes and failed - and had it pointed out by folk like > Alan Cox, that such a system is impossible due to lack of motivation > by, eg, an OMAP person to review a Samsung change.) I think this is happening more and more as we have more ARM generic and Linux generic code. Regards, Tony