From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Russell King - ARM Linux Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] omap changes for v2.6.39 merge window Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 08:45:10 +0100 Message-ID: <20110405074510.GA4699@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <201104031726.37420.arnd@arndb.de> <20110403160324.GA8050@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <201104040259.26601.arnd@arndb.de> <1301915022.15819.28.camel@e102109-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <20110404112104.GB19854@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <1301923457.417.34.camel@e102391-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <20110404133104.GA23266@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <1301925445.417.54.camel@e102391-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <4D9AB958.5010304@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4D9AB958.5010304@ti.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Santosh Shilimkar Cc: Linus Walleij , Marc Zyngier , david@lang.hm, Arnd Bergmann , Nicolas Pitre , Tony Lindgren , Catalin Marinas , lkml , Detlef Vollmann , "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Ingo Molnar , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, David Brown List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 12:10:24PM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: > The only issue I see is the clock-events implemented using > local timers capabilities in low power modes. The local timers > won't be able wakeup CPU from DORMANT or OFF state and hence > you will need an additional wakeup capable clock-event > working together with the local timers using clock-notifiers. So yet again, we have something that almost works but doesn't, and we're going to have to have board-specific hacks to work around this. This makes the architected timers totally *pointless*.