From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] OMAP PM: create a PM layer plugin for per-device constraints Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 06:59:30 -0700 Message-ID: <20110504135930.GE2092@atomide.com> References: <1304516117-9334-1-git-send-email-j-pihet@ti.com> <1304516117-9334-2-git-send-email-j-pihet@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mho-03-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.66]:33351 "EHLO mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753560Ab1EDN7e (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 May 2011 09:59:34 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1304516117-9334-2-git-send-email-j-pihet@ti.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: jean.pihet@newoldbits.com Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Kevin Hilman , paul@pwsan.com, Jean Pihet , Vishwanath BS * jean.pihet@newoldbits.com [110504 06:32]: > > +int omap_pm_set_max_mpu_wakeup_lat(struct device *dev, long t) ... > +int omap_pm_set_max_dev_wakeup_lat(struct device *req_dev, struct device *dev, ... > +int omap_pm_set_min_clk_rate(struct device *dev, struct clk *c, long r) ... You should implement this as a Linux generic framework, we don't want to add more omap specific frameworks. Or maybe you can leave this out if they're just stubs for TI CDP code? Tony