From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jarkko Nikula Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] USB patches for next merge window Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 10:15:15 +0300 Message-ID: <20110523101515.8c47e7a2.jhnikula@gmail.com> References: <20110518110353.GH13908@legolas.emea.dhcp.ti.com> <20110518114242.GI13908@legolas.emea.dhcp.ti.com> <20110523061346.GD3095@legolas.emea.dhcp.ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-ey0-f174.google.com ([209.85.215.174]:65030 "EHLO mail-ey0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752384Ab1EWHPM (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 May 2011 03:15:12 -0400 Received: by eyx24 with SMTP id 24so1719208eyx.19 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 00:15:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20110523061346.GD3095@legolas.emea.dhcp.ti.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: balbi@ti.com Cc: Tony Lindgren , Linux OMAP Mailing List On Mon, 23 May 2011 09:14:38 +0300 Felipe Balbi wrote: > a gentle ping here too. Without this we will have regressions on > ehci/ohci as the pm_runtime patches have gone in via Samuel. > Does this mean that those regressions happened already when those patches were made if there is pull request dependency? Remember bisectability is important. And very important if you are bisecting something else but which is dependent on this as then you could mark wrong good/bad points or not able to determine. -- Jarkko