From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Janusz Krzysztofik <jkrzyszt@tis.icnet.pl>
Cc: linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.0-rc1] PM / runtime: fix broken iteration over clock ids
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 19:47:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201106061947.36238.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201106051531.32878.jkrzyszt@tis.icnet.pl>
Hi,
On Sunday, June 05, 2011, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote:
> In its current form, pm_runtime_clk_notify() iterates through sub-
> strings of pm_clk_notifier_block.con_ids[0] rather than consecutive
> pm_clk_notifier_block.con_ids[] elements. As a noticeable result, McBSP1
> port no longer worked for me on updated arch/arm/mach-omap1/pm_bus.c
> (commit 600b776eb39a13a28b090ba9efceb0c69d4508aa, "OMAP1 / PM: Use
> generic clock manipulation routines for runtime PM"), not being able to
> activate "fck" when required.
>
> Tested on Amstrad Delta.
>
> Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <jkrzyszt@tis.icnet.pl>
> ---
> drivers/base/power/clock_ops.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> --- git/drivers/base/power/clock_ops.c.orig 2011-05-30 22:16:35.000000000 +0200
> +++ git/drivers/base/power/clock_ops.c 2011-06-05 15:19:55.000000000 +0200
> @@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ static int pm_runtime_clk_notify(struct
> {
> struct pm_clk_notifier_block *clknb;
> struct device *dev = data;
> - char *con_id;
> + char **con_id;
> int error;
>
> dev_dbg(dev, "%s() %ld\n", __func__, action);
> @@ -309,8 +309,8 @@ static int pm_runtime_clk_notify(struct
>
> dev->pwr_domain = clknb->pwr_domain;
> if (clknb->con_ids[0]) {
> - for (con_id = clknb->con_ids[0]; *con_id; con_id++)
> - pm_runtime_clk_add(dev, con_id);
> + for (con_id = &clknb->con_ids[0]; *con_id; con_id++)
> + pm_runtime_clk_add(dev, *con_id);
> } else {
> pm_runtime_clk_add(dev, NULL);
> }
First off, sorry for the breakage. Second, while the patch is correct in
the part is covered, it is incomplete (it also should cover the
!CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME case. So, I think the appended patch would be better.
Thanks,
Rafael
---
drivers/base/power/clock_ops.c | 16 ++++++++--------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/drivers/base/power/clock_ops.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/base/power/clock_ops.c
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/base/power/clock_ops.c
@@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ static int pm_runtime_clk_notify(struct
{
struct pm_clk_notifier_block *clknb;
struct device *dev = data;
- char *con_id;
+ char **con_id;
int error;
dev_dbg(dev, "%s() %ld\n", __func__, action);
@@ -309,8 +309,8 @@ static int pm_runtime_clk_notify(struct
dev->pwr_domain = clknb->pwr_domain;
if (clknb->con_ids[0]) {
- for (con_id = clknb->con_ids[0]; *con_id; con_id++)
- pm_runtime_clk_add(dev, con_id);
+ for (con_id = clknb->con_ids; *con_id; con_id++)
+ pm_runtime_clk_add(dev, *con_id);
} else {
pm_runtime_clk_add(dev, NULL);
}
@@ -380,7 +380,7 @@ static int pm_runtime_clk_notify(struct
{
struct pm_clk_notifier_block *clknb;
struct device *dev = data;
- char *con_id;
+ char **con_id;
dev_dbg(dev, "%s() %ld\n", __func__, action);
@@ -389,16 +389,16 @@ static int pm_runtime_clk_notify(struct
switch (action) {
case BUS_NOTIFY_ADD_DEVICE:
if (clknb->con_ids[0]) {
- for (con_id = clknb->con_ids[0]; *con_id; con_id++)
- enable_clock(dev, con_id);
+ for (con_id = clknb->con_ids; *con_id; con_id++)
+ enable_clock(dev, *con_id);
} else {
enable_clock(dev, NULL);
}
break;
case BUS_NOTIFY_DEL_DEVICE:
if (clknb->con_ids[0]) {
- for (con_id = clknb->con_ids[0]; *con_id; con_id++)
- disable_clock(dev, con_id);
+ for (con_id = clknb->con_ids; *con_id; con_id++)
+ disable_clock(dev, *con_id);
} else {
disable_clock(dev, NULL);
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-06 17:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-05 13:31 [PATCH 3.0-rc1] PM / runtime: fix broken iteration over clock ids Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-06-06 17:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2011-06-06 19:18 ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-06-07 19:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-06-07 21:24 ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2011-06-07 21:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-06-07 22:27 ` Janusz Krzysztofik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201106061947.36238.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=jkrzyszt@tis.icnet.pl \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox